It’s an urgent problem, given that over 23 billion pairs of shoes are produced each year. And while we are intrigued by Puma’s RE:SUEDE edition, we can’t help wishing the brand had been more ambitious in both the scale and speed of its new sneaker concept.
We believe the time has come. The RE:SUEDE marks the second time the brand has attempted to manufacture a sustainable sneaker, after the InCycle range in 2012, which was discontinued after four seasons due to low demand and the need for more research and development. But today's world is very different to that of 2012. Awareness of the climate and plastic waste crises are exponentially higher, while sustainable technologies have also improved, with Zeology launching at the end of 2020. Timing is everything when it comes to innovation.
Many brands are reimagining their products with various aspirations – such as Adidas x Allbirds' low-carbon sneakers and Timberland's circular commitment. Compostability is another compelling aspiration for brands looking to reduce their impact, but we question its relevance for sneakers. The composting industry is not waiting with bated breath for a ‘compostable sneaker’ – it is focused on creating quality compost or biogas from the food waste stream, not footwear.
While it is an intriguing marketing message, industrial composting facilities are not commonplace in many markets and we need to ask if composters actually want to process potentially millions of sneakers. Is this the right end-of-life solution? We think there can be more closed-loop circular options. Check out Natural Fiber Welding for better options. Once the RE:SUEDE reaches mainstream retail, it would be more effective for Puma to offer a buyback scheme to incentivise returns. This would not only enable the brand to manage its sneakers’ end-of-life, but also have the benefit of engaging customers when they are looking to make their next purchase.