Its skincare range comes self-contained in solid ingredient capsules, activated on-demand with a reusable device. Think a pod coffee machine but for skincare. It is a design that seems so simple and it needs to scale up fast to reduce the high cost. Could you make it the norm?
How would you ensure longevity of an activating device? Establishing logistics for repairs and replacement parts may be necessary to reduce any waste associated with the device. Consumers are invested in the repair economy and would be adverse to buying another device with built-in obsolescence.
What are the embodied emissions and impacts associated with manufacturing the Activator? Consider whether the use of plastic-free products offset and outweigh this, and how many uses would be required to do so.
Could your branding inadvertently generate waste? Customisation techniques for licensed products should be weighed up carefully. Each year approximately 400 million silicone moulds used to press logos into lipsticks are discarded, so prioritise efficient, low-waste branding processes.
Initial investment will be high for the consumer and, with the rising cost of living, an impossible investment for many. Is your audience prepared for a cost trade-off to reduce waste? This solution is currently best marketed at a high-spend consumer.
What low cost access solutions could you implement to broaden use and product contact? Distribution to spas, dermatologists and even retail outlets could provide a home for on-demand treatments without the need for the initial investment.
Scope for expansion into multiple product areas provides the potential for a monopoly on a consumer’s entire routine. Could you group doses into categories, regimens or concerns to streamline choice and make an all-encompassing single-dose routine the easy choice?